So I would be more inclined to support Obama's tax deal if we also agree to enforce the existing tax code like never before. No longer can Warren Buffet famously pay a lower tax rate than his middle-class secretary. No longer should there be such a lucrative business in tax law and obfuscation. If we allow the megarich to pay a lower tax rate of 36%, then let's actually make them pay 36% instead of 20% or lower once their hired help figure out all the loopholes they can jump through.
Since the Obama tax cut proposal earlier this year is actually a tax cut on everyone and not, as you would likely believe, only on people making less than $200,000 year as an individual and $250,000 a year as a family, people making from $250,000 - $500,000 a year actually would only pay $400 extra in taxes should the tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans expire. Even Bill Gates would get a tax cut, just on the first $250,000 he makes. Since 98% of Americans makes less than $250,000 a year, their whole incomes fall below the threshold, but once you make $250,001 a year, you fall into a separate class. That first $250,000 gets taxed at a lower rate, while that extra $1 gets taxed at the higher rate. That's how Obama's original plan would have worked, and it's completely reasonable. Even if you make $500,000 a year, you can afford $400 extra dollars a year in taxes. It's mindblowing that Obama, who was heralded as the Communicator of the Millenium, or might as well have been, can't seem to get this across. His Administration is shockingly pathetic at communicating and backs away from any kind of coordinated messaging. On the flip side, it is far easier to be in the minority opposition, because you can come up with pithy, catchy, two-word phrases that, irrespective of the truth, carve through the white noise. Nothing about the last two years is "job-killing" but that is the vogue phrase in American politics. So be it.
Back to Obama's tax cut deal with the Republicans, I am very sympathetic to Paul Krugman's column from yesterday, before the breaking tax news of last night, attempting, in vain, to implore the Congress to let the tax cuts expire -- for everyone -- as opposed to give in to the blackmail of the Republicans:
...if Democrats give in to the blackmailers now, they'll just face more demands in the future. As long as Republicans believe that Mr. Obama will do anything to avoid short-term pain, they'll have every incentive to keep taking hostages. If the president will endanger America's fiscal future to avoid a tax increase, what will he give to avoid a government shutdown?
So Mr. Obama should draw a line in the sand, right here, right now. If Republicans hold out, and taxes go up, he should tell the nation the truth, and denounce the blackmail attempt for what it is.
Yes, letting taxes go up would be politically risky. But giving in would be risky, too — especially for a president whom voters are starting to write off as a man too timid to take a stand. Now is the time for him to prove them wrong.
2 comments:
The problem is the Democrats waited too long to state the clear argument and to threaten to vote it all down like the Republicans did. They were terrible negotiators and couldn't arrive at a uniform opinion like the Republicans did. I agree with the frustration, but I don't think it was just Obama's team that dropped the ball on the message. It was the entire Democratic party. Here's an article worth reading about how they misplayed it and why belatedly trying to stop this insanity could just make matters worse:
http://economix.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/12/02/the-kenny-rogers-theory-of-the-bush-tax-cuts/
when unsure, just ask Dilbert.
http://dilbert.com/blog/entry/taxation/
Post a Comment